COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. STEVEN P. DIPANFILO No. 2180 EDA 2009 2010 PA Super 59 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 4/16/2010 | |
Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered June 25, 2009, in the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County, Criminal Division, at Nos. CR-0000122-07 and CP-46-CR-0000489-2008. | |
Before: BOWES, OLSON and FITZGERALD, JJ. | |
Opinion by: OLSON, J. | |
Appellant, Steven P. DiPanfilo, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on June 25, 2009. We affirm. |
Friday, April 16, 2010
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. STEVEN P. DIPANFILO
Labels:
Bowes,
Conviction,
Criminal,
DUI,
Fitzgerald,
insufficient evidence,
Olson
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
This is rediculous! How does anyone know that the reason he ran from the officer at 5am was because he had the cocaine and opiets in his possesion. How can it be proven that he did NOT swallow the drugs while on foot. Or after the witness alledgedly saw him exiting the vehicle?? To deny the appeal is only alright when the defendant has and can be proven guilty. In this case neither are prevalent. consider that the next time he stands infront of your board.
Post a Comment