Showing posts with label 5th Amendment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 5th Amendment. Show all posts

Friday, October 30, 2009

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v.TERRY L. SNAVELY


COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v.TERRY L. SNAVELY
No. 1996 MDA 2008 2009 PA Super 208 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 10/30/2009

Appeal from the Order entered October 10, 2008
In the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County
Criminal Division at No. CP-36-CR-0001377-2006
Before: KLEIN, FREEDBERG and CLELAND, JJ.
Opinion by: CLELAND, J.
Dissenting Opinion by: KLEIN, J.
Appellant Terry L. Snavely (Snavely) appeals the order revoking his parole on a sentence of imprisonment imposed on a corruption of minors charge to which he had entered an Alford plea. Because the parole-violation order recommitted him to prison but made him immediately eligible again for parole on condition he enroll in a sex offender treatment program which required an admission of guilt to the original corruption of minors offense, he contends invoking his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination renders impossible his ability to satisfy the condition. As such, he submits the sentence is manifestly unreasonable. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here

Friday, August 28, 2009

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ARNALDO TORRES SANTIAGO

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ARNALDO TORRES SANTIAGO
No. 446 EDA 2008 2009 PA Super 169 Atlantic: 980 A.2d 659 Filed: 8/28/2009

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence
Entered December 12, 2007,
Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County,
Criminal Division, at No. CP-51-CR-0802161-2006.
Before: BENDER, SHOGAN, JJ. and McEWEN, P.J.E.
Opinion by: SHOGAN, J.
Appellant, Arnaldo Torres Santiago, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following his convictions of first degree murder, possessing an instrument of crime (“PIC”), and two counts of violating the Uniform Firearms Act (“VUFA”). Appellant challenges, inter alia, the admission of the murder weapon and a witness statement obtained as a result of Appellant’s suppressed confession to police. We affirm.
-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here