REGIS INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALL AMERICAN RATHSKELLER, INC.; JASON, RYAN, CHRIS, CURTIS ROSENGRANT; COLIN HAUGHTON, GRACE JIMINEZ, ADMISTRATRIX OF THE

REGIS INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALL AMERICAN RATHSKELLER, INC.; JASON, RYAN, CHRIS, CURTIS ROSENGRANT; COLIN HAUGHTON, GRACE JIMINEZ, ADMISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF SALVADORE PETER SERRANO, AND BROOKE E. MORGAN No. 773 MDA 2007 2009 PA Super 99 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 5/28/2009
	Appeal from the Judgment entered April 9, 2007, Court of Common Pleas, Centre County, Civil Division at No. 2004-4369
Before: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J., DONOHUE and POPOVICH, JJ.
Opinion by: DONOHUE, J.
Appellant Regis Insurance Company (“Regis”) filed this declaratory judgment action to resolve a dispute over the extent of its coverage obligations to Appellee All-American Rathskeller (“Rathskeller”) under a Special Multi-Peril Policy. The trial court granted summary judgment to Rathskeller. In this appeal, Regis contends that the trial court erred in doing so and should instead have granted summary judgment in its favor or allow the declaratory judgment action to proceed to trial. After careful review, we reverse the entry of summary judgment in favor of Rathskeller and remand with instructions to enter summary judgment in favor of Regis.

-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here

Superior Court 3/20/08 - DR. ROGER STEWART v. DR. GREGORY NICOSIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND DR. GREGORY NICOSIA PARTNER TRADING AS ADVANCED DIAGNOSTICS

DR. ROGER STEWART v. DR. GREGORY NICOSIA, INDIVIDUALLY AND DR. GREGORY NICOSIA PARTNER TRADING AS ADVANCED DIAGNOSTICS AND ADVANCE DIAGNOSTICS, INC. APPEAL OF: DR. GREGORY NICOSIA
No. 1779 WDA 2005, 1135 WDA 2006 2008 PA Super 46 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 3/20/2008
Appeal from the Orders dated September 14 and 22, 2005 In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County Civil No. GD 01-013980 (Equity); GD 01-014628 (Law)
Before: MUSMANNO, ORIE MELVIN and KELLY, JJ.
Opinion by: KELLY, J.
The consolidated appeal in this matter purports to lie from an order certified by the trial court as final under Pa.R.A.P. 341(c) in a declaratory judgment action brought to determine whether the parties’ business dealings could be characterized as a partnership. We quash, as the order under consideration is not final and appealable.