Showing posts with label intent to deliver. Show all posts
Showing posts with label intent to deliver. Show all posts

Monday, December 13, 2010

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ABRAHAM GONZALEZ

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ABRAHAM GONZALEZ
No. 687 EDA 2009 2010 PA Super 229 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 12/13/2010

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered January 23, 2009,
in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County,
Criminal, No. CP-51-CR-0307451-2006
Before: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J., BOWES, J., and McEWEN, P.J.E.
Opinion by: McEWEN, P.J.E.
Dissenting Opinion by: BOWES, J.
Appellant, Abraham Gonzalez, here appeals from the judgment of sentence to serve a term of imprisonment of from two and one-half years to six years, a sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to one count of possession of a controlled substance (heroin) with intent to deliver. We vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for resentencing.

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered January 23, 2009,
in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County,
Criminal, No. CP-51-CR-0307451-2006




-----------------------------------------------------Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SANDRA ROBINSON

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SANDRA ROBINSON
No. 1561 EDA 2009 2010 PA Super 192 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 10/20/2010

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered April 16, 2009,
Court of Common Pleas, Chester County,
Criminal Division, at No. CP-15-CR-0002237-2007.
Before: GANTMAN, SHOGAN and MUNDY, JJ.
Opinion by: SHOGAN, J.
Appellant, Sandra Robinson, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following her conviction of four counts each of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, simple possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia, and one count each of criminal use of a communication facility and criminal conspiracy. On appeal, Appellant challenges the trial court’s refusal to grant her eligibility for the Recidivism Risk Reduction Incentive (“RRRI”) program. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the judgment of sentence and remand for resentencing.
-----------------------------------------------------Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KARAY PRINICE HUDSON

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. KARAY PRINICE HUDSON
No. 2166 MDA 2008 2010 PA Super 96 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 5/25/2010

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered on October 31, 2008
in the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County,
Criminal Division, No. CP-06-CR-0002523-2008
Before: MUSMANNO, SHOGAN, JJ. and McEWEN, P.J.E.
Opinion by: MUSMANNO, J.
Karay Prinice Hudson (“Hudson”) appeals from the judgment of sentence entered following his conviction of two counts each of possession of a controlled substance (marijuana and cocaine) and possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver (marijuana and cocaine). We vacate the judgment of sentence and remand.
-----------------------------------------------------Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SABOR COLEMAN

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SABOR COLEMAN
No. 995 EDA 2009 2009 PA Super 229 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 12/1/2009

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered on February
23, 2009, in the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County,
Criminal Division, at No(s). CP-23-CR-0004715-2008
Before: STEVENS, POPOVICH, and HUDOCK*, JJ.
Opinion by: HUDOCK, J.
Appellant, Sabor Coleman, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on February 23, 2009, as made final by the denial of post-sentence motions on March 5, 2009. We affirm.
-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here