Superior Court - PRIME MEDICA ASSOCIATES v. VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY, T/A D/B/A AND/OR A/K/A CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY AND/OR CNA

PRIME MEDICA ASSOCIATES v. VALLEY FORGE INSURANCE COMPANY, T/A D/B/A AND/OR A/K/A CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY AND/OR CNA No. 3279 and 3331 EDA 2006 2009 PA Super 39 Atlantic: 970 A.2d 1149 Filed: 3/5/2009
	Appeal from the Judgment entered December 27, 2006 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Civil, November Term, 2004, No. 000621
Before: KLEIN, GANTMAN, AND KELLY, JJ.
Opinion by: GANTMAN, J.
The parties, Valley Forge Insurance Company, t/a d/b/a and/or a/k/a Continental Casualty Company and/or CNA (“Insurer”) and Prime Medica Associates (“Insured”), appeal and cross-appeal from the judgment entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas in favor of Insured in this breach of contract action. We reverse and remand with instructions.

-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here

Superior Court - COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DAVID PAGE

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DAVID PAGE No. 451 WDA 2008 2009 PA Super 20 Atlantic: 965 A.2d 1212 Filed: 2/3/2009
	Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence February 28, 2008, In the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County, Criminal at No. 442/06
Before: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J., FREEDBERG, J. AND MCEWEN, P.J.E.
Opinion by: FREEDBERG, J.
Concurring and Dissenting Statement by: McEWEN, P.J.E.
This is an appeal from judgment of sentence entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Lawrence County after a jury convicted David Page of two counts of aggravated indecent assault, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3125(a)(7) and (b), one count of indecent assault, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3126(a)(7), and one count of corruption of minors, 18 Pa.C.S.A. 6301(a). Appellant was sentenced to a term of incarceration of five to ten years. Appellant contends that the trial court erred when it failed to suppress a statement made by Appellant, when it permitted evidence of prior bad acts, when it allowed the Commonwealth to amend the information after close of the evidence and prior to closing arguments, and when it allowed the Commonwealth to discuss prior bad acts of Appellant during its closing argument. We affirm.

-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here