Showing posts with label purchase. Show all posts
Showing posts with label purchase. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

THEODORE A. GALL, III A/K/A TED GALL AND THEODORE A. GALL IV A/K/A TED GALL, JR. v. DAVID A. CRAWFORD AND DIANE J. CRAWFORD, a/k/a DIANE CRAWFORD

THEODORE A. GALL, III A/K/A TED GALL AND THEODORE A. GALL IV A/K/A TED GALL, JR. v. DAVID A. CRAWFORD AND DIANE J. CRAWFORD, a/k/a DIANE CRAWFORD, HIS WIFE
No. 1741 and 1811 WDA 2008 2009 PA Super 187 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 9/16/2009

Appeal from the Order dated September 10, 2008
In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County
Civil No. GD07-00804
Before: DONOHUE, CLELAND and KELLY, JJ.
Opinion by: KELLY, J.
David A. Crawford and Diane J. Crawford, Appellants, and Theodore A. Gall, III and Theodore A. Gall, IV, Appellees, have filed cross appeals from the order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County granting in part and denying in part each party’s respective motions for post-trial relief. The appeals were consolidated by per curiam order on December 2, 2008. We affirm, finding that the prothonotary has the authority under Pa.R.C.P. 1037 to enter a default judgment in an equitable action and to set trial for damages.
-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Superior Court - ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE v. MARK D. MAIER AND EMILY A. MAIER

ERIE INSURANCE EXCHANGE v. MARK D. MAIER AND EMILY A. MAIER
No. 2094 WDA 2007 2008 PA Super 297 Atlantic: 963 A.2d 907 Filed: 12/31/2008

Appeal from the Order of October 19, 2007
In the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County,
Civil, No. 15086-06
Before: KLEIN, POPOVICH and FITZGERALD*, JJ.
Opinion by: KLEIN, J.Blogger: Pennsylvania Case Law UpdatBlogger: Pennsylvania Case Law Update - Create Poste - Create Post
Concurring Statement by: FITZGERALD, J.
Erie Insurance Exchange (Erie) appeals from a declaratory judgment ordering it to defend and indemnify Mark W. Maier and Emily A. Maier and denying its cross-motion to refuse to order it to defend and indemnify. We reverse both orders and rule that Erie is under no obligation to either defend or indemnify the Maiers.
-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here