Showing posts with label unjust enrichment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unjust enrichment. Show all posts

Friday, October 2, 2009

NANCY A. WHITE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY

NANCY A. WHITE, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
No. 1437 EDA 2008 2009 PA Super 194 Atlantic: n/a Petition for Reargument Denied 11/23/2009 Filed: 10/2/2009

Appeal from the Order Entered April 21, 2008
In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
Civil at No(s): 0388 December Term, 2006
Before: STEVENS, PANELLA, and FREEDBERG, JJ.
Opinion by: PANELLA, J.
Appellant, Nancy White, appeals from the order entered on April 21, 2008 by the Honorable Jane Cutler Greenspan, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, which dismissed the complaint with prejudice for failure to exhaust statutory remedies and denied the motion to certify class as moot. After careful review, we reverse.
-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Superior Court - ESTATE OF MATTHEW CONSIDINE v. WACHOVIA BANK AND ROBERT E. ROZINSKI

ESTATE OF MATTHEW CONSIDINE v. WACHOVIA BANK AND ROBERT E. ROZINSKI
No. 3191 EDA 2007 2009 PA Super 21 Atlantic: 966 A.2d 1148 Filed: 2/4/2009

Appeal from the Order entered November 7, 2007
In the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County
Civil No. 05-15251
Before: SHOGAN, KELLY, JJ. & McEWEN, P.J.E.
Opinion by: KELLY, J.
The estate of Matthew Considine, Appellant, has filed an appeal from the order entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County granting Appellee Robert Rozinski’s motion for summary judgment. We quash, finding that we do not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Superior Court - LUZ LUGO AND YESENIA MARCO ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED INDIVIDUALS v. FARMERS PRIDE, INC.

LUZ LUGO AND YESENIA MARCO ON BEHALF OF THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER SIMILARLY SITUATED INDIVIDUALS v. FARMERS PRIDE, INC.
No. 582 EDA 2007 2009 PA Super 5 Atlantic: 967 A.2d 963 Petition for Reargument Denied 3/18/2009 Filed: 1/15/2009

Appeal from the Order Dated February 1, 2007,
in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County
Civil Division at No. July Term, 2006, No. 002187
Before: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J., PANELLA AND KELLY, JJ.
Opinion by: FORD ELLIOT, P.J.
In this appeal of a class action, appellants challenge the sustaining of preliminary objections to their complaint. Among those objections were two in the nature of a demurrer, which encompassed each of the four substantive counts of appellants’ complaint, and which effectively terminated the litigation and disposed of the entire case. The court also sustained an objection to venue in Philadelphia County. Upon review, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
-----------------------------------------------------
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here