| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TRACY DANIELS No. 3477 EDA 2008 2010 PA Super 112 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 6/18/2010 | |
| Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered June 5, 2008, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Criminal Division, at No. CP-51-CR-0007123-2007. | |
| Before: SHOGAN, POPOVICH and CLELAND, JJ. | |
| Opinion by: SHOGAN, J. | |
| Appellant, Tracy Daniels, appeals from the judgment of sentence entered on June 5, 2008 in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas. Appellant’s counsel has filed a petition to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Commonwealth v. McClendon, 495 Pa. 467, 434 A.2d 1185 (1981). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of sentence and grant counsel’s petition to withdraw. | |
Showing posts with label Ineffective. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ineffective. Show all posts
Friday, June 18, 2010
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. TRACY DANIELS
Labels:
Cleland,
counsel withdrawal,
Criminal,
Ineffective,
Popovich,
PWID,
Shogan,
Suppression
Friday, November 20, 2009
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RAYMOND E. HAUN
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. RAYMOND E. HAUN, No. 1980 MDA 2008 2009 PA Super 223 Atlantic: n/a Filed: 11/20/2009 | |
| Appeal from the PCRA Order November 4, 2008 In the Court of Common Pleas of Centre County Criminal Division at No. CP-14-CR-0001493-2004 | |
| Before: BENDER, FREEDBERG and POPOVICH, JJ. | |
| Opinion by: BENDER, J. | |
| Raymond E. Haun (Appellant) appeals from the order dismissing his petition for relief filed under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA). See 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546. Appellant claims that the PCRA court erred in relying on our decision in Commonwealth v. Lantzy, 712 A.2d 288 (Pa. Super. 1998) (en banc), reversed, 736 A.2d 564 (Pa. 1999). For the reasons that follow, we reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. | |
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here
Monday, August 10, 2009
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JAMEEN WARREN
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JAMEEN WARREN No. 1981 EDA 2008 2009 PA Super 158 Atlantic: 979 A.2d 920 Filed: 8/10/2009 | |
| Appeal from the PCRA Order entered June 4, 2008 In the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County Criminal No.: CP-23-CR-0005176-2003 | |
| Before: BENDER, ALLEN, and FITZGERALD, JJ. | |
| Opinion by: FITZGERALD, J. | |
| Appellant, Jameen Warren, appeals from the order entered in the Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, dismissing his first petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-46. Appellant and counsel have also filed separate petitions to remand for appointment of new counsel. We hold that PCRA counsel may not justify his failure to argue certain issues by claiming those issues are without merit, and then argue broadly that an evidentiary hearing was warranted without specifying what issues merited a hearing. Accordingly, we vacate the order, dismiss Appellant’s pro se petition, and grant counsel’s petition to remand for the appointment of new counsel. | |
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here
Labels:
Allen,
Bender,
Criminal,
Fitzgerald,
Ineffective,
Murder,
PCRA
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. GARRICK MOORE
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. GARRICK MOORE No. 1442 and 1448 WDA 2008 2009 PA Super 134 Atlantic: 978 A.2d 988 Filed: 7/15/2009 | |
| Appeal from the Order entered August 4, 2008, in the Court of Common Pleas of Erie County, Criminal Division at Nos. 325, 326 and 327 of 2008 | |
| Before: BOWES, ALLEN, and KELLY, JJ. | |
| Opinion by: ALLEN, J. | |
| Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by: BOWES, J. | |
| Garrick Moore (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court order denying his petition for extension of time to file a post-sentence motion. We remand with instructions, and hold that, for reasons of judicial economy and fairness, a defendant who raises ineffective assistance of counsel claims after being found in contempt of a Protection from Abuse order (“PFA”) and sentenced to imprisonment pursuant to 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 6114, is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the ineffectiveness of counsel claims, such that the record is adequate to assess the claims on direct appeal, consistent with Commonwealth v. Bomar, 826 A.2d 831 (Pa. 2003). | |
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here
Labels:
Allen,
Bowes,
Criminal,
Ineffective,
Kelly,
Nunc pro tunc,
post-sentence
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Superior Court - COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SAMUEL E. HARRIS
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. SAMUEL E. HARRIS No. 634 MDA 2007 2009 PA Super 78 Atlantic: 972 A.2d 1196 Filed: 4/22/2009 | |
| Appeal from the Order Entered March 30, 2007, in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County Criminal Division at No. CP-36-CR-0002649-2001 | |
| Before: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J., DONOHUE AND POPOVICH, JJ. | |
| Opinion by: FORD ELLIOT, P.J. | |
| The Commonwealth appeals the March 30, 2007 order granting Samuel Harris’s (“appellee’s”) petition filed pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (“PCRA”), 42 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 9541-9546. The PCRA court determined that appellee had received ineffective assistance of counsel when his attorney failed to file a motion to suppress his statements to the police following his arrest. After careful review, we reverse the order of the PCRA court. | |
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here
Labels:
Criminal,
Donohue,
Ford Elliot,
Ineffective,
PCRA,
Popovich,
Suppression
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Superior Court - COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CLAY WILLIAMS
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. CLAY WILLIAMS No. 3458 EDA 2006 2008 PA Super 250 Atlantic: 959 A.2d 1252 Filed: 10/22/2008 | |
| Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence December 5, 2006 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal at No(s): CP-51-CR-0505851-2005 | |
| Before: STEVENS, MUSMANNO, and BENDER, JJ. | |
| Opinion by: STEVENS, J. | |
| The instant matter is an appeal from the judgment of sentence entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County on December 5, 2006, at which time the trial court sentenced Appellant Clay Williams (hereinafter “Appellant”) to life in prison. Appellant also has filed with this Court a Petition for Remand to Trial Court to Develop Record. Upon our review, we deny Appellant’s petition, affirm his judgment of sentence, and dismiss his ineffectiveness of counsel claims without prejudice to raise them on collateral review. | |
Want 50 state & federal case law? - click here
Labels:
Bender,
Criminal,
Ineffective,
Musmanno,
Stevens
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)